In the Eye of the Hurricane: Florida Courts, Judicial Independence, and Politics
نویسندگان
چکیده
This Article discusses the concept of judicial independence, the political nature of the courts, and efforts to insulate the courts from the ordinary politics engulfing the popularly elected branches. It reviews Florida’s political history and changing political landscape. It traces the development of the state’s judicial selection processes and ties them to current legislation being considered. It concludes by discussing the likely consequences of the efforts to diminish the insulation the the Florida courts enjoy from the politics of the day. IN THE EYE OF THE HURRICANE: FLORIDA COURTS, JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, AND POLITICS Drew Noble Lanier* and Roger Handberg**
منابع مشابه
The Role of Judicial Procedure Courts in the Development of Iranian Administrative Law
Today, in leading administrative law systems, the judicial process along with the law is the most important source of legal rules, and the law alone can not feed the legal system. Although in the administrative law system of Iran, the use of judicial procedure has often been considered as a source and interpretation of the law and not as the main source, but the role of administrative courts, ...
متن کاملInterbranch Accountability in State Government and the Constitutional Requirement of Judicial Independence
When contemporary commentators decry what they describe as growing threats to “judicial independence,” they typically invoke “judicial independence” as a normative ideal—an institutional virtue. That virtue is the capacity of courts to protect individual rights, to police structural limits on governmental power, and to decide individual disputes based solely on the applicable law and the factua...
متن کاملJudicial Independence in Europe
• Understanding to what extent judicial independence is adhered to in various jurisdictions requires a theoretical framework of what the principle entails. On a preliminary analysis, the principle can be said to require the following: judicial systems must be free, in fact and appearance, from any undue influence that might prevent judges from adjudicating legal disputes solely on the basis of ...
متن کاملA Few Thoughts on Judicial Supremacy: a Response to Professors Carrington and Cramton
The efforts of Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Stephen Breyer to provoke examination of the vitality of the American judiciary’s independence have inspired two conferences,1 which in turn have produced many thoughtful papers and much commentary. I have been asked to respond to one such paper offered by Professors Paul Carrington of Duke and Roger Cramton of Cornell.2 These two distinguished sc...
متن کاملFundamental Principles Regarding the Guarantee of the Principle of Judicial Impartiality in the International System and the Law of Iranian Law
The principles of independence and impartiality of the Judiciary is one of the most important grounds to achieve a fair trial and to ensure the rights of citizens in the proceedings, the principles which are inevitable for the existence of a judiciary whit fair and equitable judges. These principles have recognized in the vast majority of domestic legal systems as well as international legal re...
متن کامل